Well, I was reading this interesting article about a recent discovery that led to the idea that we are not from here! ..Meaning that we are not from the Milky Way, the big galaxy that somewhere is still naked-eye visible. So our “father” galaxy is the Sagittarius Dwarf Galaxy.

Additional article to read about this argument:
http://www.solstation.com/x-objects/sag-deg.htm

Well, interesting, but not related to the purpose of this blog/report.

But the article linked this new discovery to other particular phenomenons, that we may call Solar System Warming, you can read a previous post for further information.

More than anything I found interesting this part:

It has been postulated that this is the real reason for both global warming since higher energy levels of the Milky Way are almost certain to cause our Sun to burn hotter and emit higher energies. Indeed, temperatures have been seen to rise on virtually all the planets in our system. This seems quite apart from any local phenomenon like greenhouse gases etc.

This grand turning is possibly the root cause for the discontinuation of the Mayan calendar (the most accurate on the planet) because the ‘read-point’ of the Pleiades star cluster, which many believe the calendar was based upon, can no longer be a constant as we begin to steer away from the earlier predictable movements.

I do not have enought knowledge to say that is possible, but what red above brought to my mind the electric model of the sun, well, if I’m not wrong they said that the energy emitted from te sun does not come directly from the sun itself, but from an outher source, and if it’s the energy that comes from the higly energetic center of the galaxy? Probably the changes in alignment to the milky way will have a certain influence onto the solar output, as it was already recorded.

Well, surely it’s more original as a theory than the Nibiru One..

Aand.. I searched for further informations, and found out that article (http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/sun_output_030320.html) from space.com.. According to that article it’s something really happening, BUT, the highest level of sun activity is not now, it’s increasing, but yet, you have to see this..

Month Average solar
flux at Earth		 International sunspot number Smoothed sunspot number
2000.04 184.2 125.5 120.8
cycle 23 sunspot max.
2000.07 202.3 170.1 119.8
2001.12 235.1 132.2 114.6 (-0.9)
2007.05 74.4 11.7 8.6 (-1.2)
2007.06 73.7 12.1 7.6 (-1.0)
2007.07 71.6 9.7 6.9 (-0.7)
2007.08 69.1 6.0 6.0 (-0.9)
2007.09 67.1 2.4 5.9 (-0.1)
2007.10 67.4 0.9 6.0 (+0.1)
2007.11 69.6 1.7 5.7 (-0.3)
2007.12 78.5 10.1 4.9 (-0.8)
2008.01 74.3 3.4 4.2 (-0.7)
2008.02 71.1 2.1 (3.7 predicted, -0.5)
2008.03 72.9 9.3 (3.8 predicted, +0.1)
2008.04 70.2 2.9 (4.3 predicted, +0.5)
2008.05 68.4 2.9 (5.1 predicted, +0.8 )
2008.06 65.8 3.1 (5.9 predicted, +0.8 )
2008.07 65.7 0.5 (6.9 predicted, +1.0)
2008.08 66.0 (1) 0.0 (2) (8.7 predicted, +1.8 )

From http://www.dxlc.com/solar/index.html

And this

Taken from space.com

(Thanks to the respective owners for the data and images)

As you can see the solar flux is NOT at its maximum, but in any case it seems to have also a kind of annual flux variability, and now (August 2008) it seems to be in the increasing period, we’ll see the levels it will reach.

Also, the sun surface seemed to be at it’s maximum activity level at the end of 1999, pretty cool.. but, this does not correspond to the maximum solar flux to earth, that was in late 2001. Well, surely there is an explanation for this.

It will be interesting to see if the increased activity correspond to particular alignments, to planets or to the galaxy itself! This could become the proof of the theory of cosmic alignment leading to excessive solar activity (= big problems to earth).

Site explaining about planets alignment: http://www.etsu.edu/physics/etsuobs/starprty/22099dgl/planalign.htm

Cosmic Rays and Solar activity

A german scientist believes that there is a tight relation between cosmic rays levels and solar activity:

http://www.klimamanifest-von-heiligenroth.de/borcherte.pdf

Quoting what the scientist wrote:

“In the last thirty years the main increase of temperature in Central Europe happened within the short period of 4 years between 1987 and 1991. This event was coincidental with increasing sun activities, increasing intensities of sun winds and with decreasing cosmic radiation (neutron rates) with the consequences of reducing cloudiness, increasing global radiation and increasing ground near temperature. It leads to the opinion that Climate Change in the past century in Central Europe seems to be mainly Sun made.”

How the cosmic radiation is related to the sun activity is not clear (at least to me), he states that lower cosmic rays activity leads to lower cloudiness and consequently to higher ground temperatures.
Cosmic Rays more clouds? How can this be? Explanations? I’ll try to find out more next.